The selfishly performed acts of gambling to relieve

The Truth vs Angie Bachmann  Addiction is rarely believed to be a brain disease or emerge in people’s daily lives. People are blinded by their habits and behaviors not consciously aware of addiction fooling their brain. In Chapter 9 of “The Power Of Habit”, author Charles Duhigg explains a case about a woman Angie Bachmann who develops a devastating addiction to gambling, leading to her family’s bankruptcy. Angie Bachmann blamed the casino Harrah’s for manipulating her into spending more and more money into a gambling addiction. However, the Harrah’s casino is a business and businesses do anything to keep in revenue. They never physically harassed her or forced her to gamble. Bachmann is responsible for her gambling debts because she is aware of her addiction but fails to control her behavior.Bachmann is responsible for her gambling debts because she knew the risks of gambling before she visited her first casino. “She knew gambling could lead to trouble, so she set strict rules for herself. No more than one hour at the blackjack table per trip, and she only gambled what was in her wallet” (Duhigg 59). An addiction does not form right away. Bachmann could have tried to control her gambling impulses before they got bad.Bachmann could have ignored all of the mail from Harrah’s casino and stay in Tennessee. “She may have made a choice that first day when she got dressed up and decided to spend the afternoon in a casino, and perhaps in the weeks or months followed. But years later, by the time she was losing $250,000 in a single night, after she was so desperate to fight the urges that she moved to a state where gambling wasn’t legal, she was no longer making conscious decisions” (Duhigg 63). Bachmann should have stayed in tennessee where gambling is illegal, but she chose to go back to her old habits and act unresponsible.Bachmann selfishly performed acts of gambling to relieve her depression and anxiety. “At the tables she was numb and excited, and her anxieties grew go faint she couldn’t hear them anymore” (Duhigg 60). There are other alternatives to help with anxiety such as mediating or exercising. Bachmann knew gambling was not a suitable option yet she still went for it. She also kept her spending and addiction a secret from her family until she lost everything. “She kept her losses a secret from her husband, but when her other finally cut off the stipends, she broke down and confessed” (Duhigg 58). If she felt that her losses weren’t her fault, she would not have lied. She felt guilty knowing that she made those decisions on her own.Bachmann had to file for bankruptcy and she still went back to gambling.” Harrah’s, of course, was well aware that Bachmann had declared bankruptcy a few years earlier and had walked away from $20,000 in gambling debts” (Duhigg 61). She had lost everything whether it was her line of credit from her home or her inheritance . Her gambling addiction was out of hand. She should learn something from this experience, but she still gambled after bankruptcy.Harrah’s casino is not responsible for Bachmann’s gambling debts because it’s not a crime alluring or persuading gamblers. “The justices, acting on behalf of society, said Bachmann was wrong. There is no common law duty obligating a casino operator to refrain from attempting to entice or contact gamblers that it knows or should know are compulsive gamblers” (Duhigg 55). There isn’t a law where businesses can not contact gamblers. It’s up to the gamblers if they will accept casinos offers and loan huge amount of money from the casino. It’s the responsibility of the gamblers to pay their debts to the casino company.People might say that Harrah’s provoked Bachmann to spend more money with each visit. True, Harrah’s casino used business marketing to get Bachmann back into their casino, but they did not force her. She made the decision to go back. “Harrah’s gave her $10,000 to play with, compliments of the house. One night, she won $60,000. Twice she walked away up $40,000. One time she went to Vegas with $100,000 in her bad and came home with nothing” (Duhigg 62). She is accountable for her mistakes because she did not seek help and did not leave her gambling lifestyle behind even after losing every penny she had. Angie Bachmann is responsible for all of her gambling losses. She had the responsibility to change her gambling habit, but she did not try hard enough to change. Harrah’s actions were justified and legal. Bachmann is a grown woman is responsible for all her actions. Nowadays, with pathological gambling being more common and considered a serious addiction, treatments are more accessible. She blamed Harrah’s casino for manipulating her into gambling more money at the casino. However, Bachmann knew the consequences of gambling and kept on going. Bachmann chose to spend her parents money and she even took out a loan out of her home. She lost everything and even moved to a state where gambling is illegal. Bachmann was addicted and she was blinded by the fact she lost everything and still chose to go back.                                                                                                         Works CitedDuhigg, Charles.  The Power of Habit.  Random: New York 2012.