Question Policy A policy of the upgrade of


Question 2.3

Stakeholder Analysis

stakeholder analysis is an important precondition of the decision whether to
construct a nuclear power plant in Oregon. Identifying potential risks is one
of the importance of conducting the stakeholder analysis. Constructing a
nuclear power plant in Oregon may lead to several risks to the area and to the people living in the area. Assessing
these risks is important such that before construction risks can be mitigated
and their effects. It is also important for a stakeholder analysis in order to inform key people concerning the
project before entering the execution phase such as the donors and the
people living around.

other importance is to identify the interests of different
stakeholders. Stakeholder analysis should be done to identify the
different interests. Lastly, conducting a stakeholder analysis of the nuclear power plant play as a mechanism
to influence other stakeholders. For instance, residents may oppose the
construction of the plant but use the
analysis; other stakeholders may assure
the residents of Oregon compensation and alter their initial stand.

Analysis for a planned upgrade to a successful software product (SPSS)

Step 1:

purpose of this analysis is to identify the stakeholders to identify potential
installers of the SPSS software in computers and the end users of the software
such as companies and organizations. The upgrade needs to be launched with
several users before being rolled out to the public for purchase. In this step,
a working group will be trained on the
upgrade of SPSS and how to work with it. Five trainees will be used for the stakeholder analysis. In this
step, the plan and a timeline will be provided
to the group. For instance, the group will provide the policymakers with a
conclusions’ presentation at the end of the given timeline. Interviews and
rescheduling will be done in this step.

Step 2:
Selection and Definition of a Policy

policy of the upgrade of the SPSS will be defined. For instance, the policy may
state that: Upgrading SPSS. This policy
should justify the funds and resources it needs and the returns. The definition
of the policy may be Upgrading SPSS: the
permanent switch to an advanced SPSS software. The policy will then be
discussed between the analysis group and the policymakers to bring about the
ideas and concepts to be shared with the
stakeholders during the stakeholder analysis.

Step 3:
Identification of Key Stakeholders

working group has the responsibility to determine the list of stakeholders to
be interviewed during this analysis. For instance, the stakeholders likely to
be interviewed for the upgrade of the SPSS software include the donors, computer producers such as dell, and SPSS users
such as universities among others.

Step 4:
Tools Adaptation

are tools that the working group will adapt to gather information on the
stakeholders to interview. These include
definition of the characteristics of the stakeholders, stakeholder table,
questionnaire and protocol and a reference chart.         The working group need
to adapt all these tools to guarantee a successful stakeholder analysis.

Step 5:
Information collection and Recording

working group will collect information on the stakeholders and record it.

Information may be from secondary sources such as newspapers, speeches, and institutional reports. The group should
make a review of the existing information before making any interview
appointments. In the end, the group will
conduct the interviews and record their notes.

Step 6:
Filling in the stakeholder table

information gathered from the interview is arranged in a systematic and concise
format. The table will determine the stakeholders’ position before deciding to make an upgrade to the SPSS software.