In get a better life. In this paper

Inthe films, Snowpiercer and Metropolis capitalism is uncovered from its verymechanics in the root, from the working masses at the base, to the intensefirst class at the best. In the two films their aspects of culture that in manyways keep the people in a lower position of life in addition to the politics.

Populations that work in the Metropolis film shows to be reduced significantlyby the introduction of big machines assist in the running of the high risesseen actually expending laborers. Imagery has been used in both films in amajor way for example in the Snowpiercer the film has been created with thebelief that the trail can forever sustain the needs of its passengers. In boththe Snowpiercer and Metropolis the rail and the city is the only world thecharacters know about so the only option is to fight their way into the higherranks of the living setup of the rich to get a better life. Inthis paper the central question is class, cultural and political issues; it isviews ofsocial class theirlook at social stratification and class theories that act as the bestpredictorsof therelationship of the rich and the poor. The discussion is going to circle aroundthedifferencesbetween 1% of the populations that get 99% of the resources against a 99% thatisbarely gettingthrough survival consuming 99% of the resources. It speaks of why the playingground that is notlevel for these two populations in the society. Questions raised in the filmsis that what makesit morally acceptable for the 1% to feel that it is okay to dominate the restof the population?Which factors contribute to the maintenance of status quo? How are theseissues applied sowell to keep the lower population in check? In the two films their aspects ofculture that inmany ways keep the people in a lower position of life in addition to thepolitics.

Arts ofthese films are fit for the description whereby socioeconomic situationsexpress aneconomic dichotomy vertically as a bottom to the top comparison. With clearindication ofdissatisfaction of ruling powers which spur up revolts in areas that caused byasense of lack ofsatisfaction with the people who seem to have all the power in charge of theruling ( 1% whoown it all facing off with the rest of the population). This paper is acomparison of thefilm Snowpiercer and Metropolis looking at the major similarities and themanner in whichthey are relevant to today society.

Snowpierceris a film about a group of rebels pushing forward from the back of a trainin an ice agewhere the only aim is to get level the playing field. This comes after a groupofthe only survivorsare packed in deplorable conditions in a life train after an attempt to fightclimatic changebecomes tragic causing an ice age. Snowpiercer is the name of this train thatis intended keepto all its occupants alive with is self-sustaining capabilities as it goesroundaround the worldcutting through the ice with ease. Inferior people are confined in the tail bythe people who arein charge, the tail is slum dwelling setups comprised of packed togetherquarters which arereduced to meals of protein blocks for survival with no other luxury in anysocial form.

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,80
Delivery
4,90
Support
4,70
Price
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
4,70
Writers Experience
4,70
Delivery
4,60
Support
4,60
Price
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,50
Delivery
4,40
Support
4,10
Price
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

Thisopposite of the head of the rail where there are coaches and coaches of foodto the extentwhere the some of them are utilized as class rooms from the children of theeliteoccupants of thefirst coach. A revolt is the coordinated by one of the occupants of the tailCurtis. This iswith the aim to dispatch a revolt in light of a hunch that the officers mayhavecome up short onprojectiles after the past revolt, yet his hesitance to lead persistentlyscattersthe lower-classes’enthusiasm for ascending and taking over the Snowpiercer. He stirs up theneed to get to thefront with every passing minute sparking the need for freedom to eat to eatand live betterwithout the fear of death as they have been made to belief is the way of lifetothe people who goagainst system which has a plan on how the natural order of things shouldbe.Whereas,’Metropolis’ is believed to be a futuristic setup of living in a city that iscompriseddystopian vision. This is a state on earth that has towers housing which isconstructedoutrageously high into the air.

In the interim, down underneath those highrisesinvolved by therich world class are the shocking machines running on 24-hour plans thatkeep the citygoing and the tip top securely isolated from the filth down below of which theyknow close tonothing. This city is run by John Frederson, a mix of representative andgovernmentofficial who’s everyday routine is characterized by his transcription ofrequeststo subordinates.He is the son of the supreme leader of the city. There is a lot that ispinpointed by thisfilm such how some things never change that is despite the film being setin the future. Forinstance, some young men in this film appear to be entitled are as yetcharacterized bytheir capacity to roll and waste: Freder invests his energy taking part incostly brandishingexercises or lolling the hours away by gardens on the tops of the towerswhile gazing atyoung ladies wearing fundamentally fewer items of clothing than the youngmen. Because ofthe particular reason of poor and inconsiderate leadership an uprising comeup to over throughthe current leadership that is bent on keeping the poor in poverty while atthe same timemaking the rich richer.Inboth the Snowpiercer and Metropolis the rail and the city is the only world thecharacters knowabout so the only option is to fight their way into the higher ranks of theliving setup ofthe rich to get a better life.

This is a similarity that is very important inthecase of these twofilms because it introduces a struggle that only ends when the characters getwhat they want.The Snowpiercer adds an interesting twist in the way that a large number ofraces cometogether to work towards a common goal. The communication of this film, in thiscase, is thatthere is need to involve the whole world in the war on climate change.

Suchmessages arehidden throughout these films; this is an important communication to theaudience as thereis a need for a proper synergy in the fight for the future of humankind. Inthe Metropolis themodern city sky scrapers indicate an advanced growth in the way of life.The people formdown below the crazy are concern that their cries are not being heard,therefore they tofight this they group up to find an easy to way to find a way to the top of thetower.Theuprising of the workers and the train passengers pass on an extremely criticalandimperativesocio-political message about imbalances in the public eye and the fate ofpresentdayprivate enterprisein and the manner in which it is run. In the film, Metropolis capitalismis uncovered fromits very mechanics in the root, from the working masses at the base, to theintense firstclass at the best. Oppression in these films is shown implicitly as theofficersthroughout thefilms are given direction to take part public executions to instill fear in thehearts of City haslikewise ended up being prophetic, the same number of the subjects itinvestigated justabout a century prior are as important, and squeezing, today as they were thepoint at which thefilm was first released for public viewing.

Imageryhas been used in both films in a major way for example in the Snowpiercerthe film has beencreated with the belief that the trail can forever sustain the needs of itspassengers. Theonly thing is to make others survive only on a protein bar that appears to bemade only forpreventing them from dying. It is that way because a portion of people on thetrain believe thatall the great food provisions belong to them.

It is an indication that theworld is being runby machines and there is no going back. It is similar in the case ofMetropolis whichdelineates a world where machines operate every single part of the society.This, obviously,was a response against the expanding robotization of present-day socialorders in thenineteenth and mid-twentieth century. Populations that work in the Metropolis Ithe film a show tobe reduced significantly by the introduction of big machines assist in therunning of thehigh rises seen actually expending laborers. At the end of the day, monstermachines havetransformed into malignant divine beings that request human penances(Brandon E.

).Fora motion picture that was made right around a century prior, Metropolis isstillfrightfullysignificant. Relevance of such movies today is the lingering reality of how useofmachines isinevitableInspite of the fact that our development may not in the flesh take after onedelineatedin this movie,numerous different courses which draw clear lines against each other. Forinstance, infinancial positions, the dissimilarity amongst laborers and moguls is morenoteworthy thanany time in recent memory. That is the main difference between these twomovies as in thefirst one where the train passengers are not expected to give labor in returnfor the littlefood they are given. In the Snowpiercer the passengers are picked out one byoneto head into thehead of the train, this makes the remaining passengers feel like somethingbad keeps onhappening the one go through the door to the head of the train.

No one evercomes back aftergoing through the door. The labors of this area of this high-rises are treatedreally badly whichwould mean that they are not in control of what they are doing because theoverlords arewatching their every move and punishing them for any slip-ups.Similarlypertinent is the way that innovation is taking over an ever more noteworthypart in ourgeneral public; the idea of robots or machines isn’t as outlandish as it was ina daythat is highlycelebrated. Surely, much has been said before around common risks and moralmatters emergingwith armed automatons. Robots that take part in surgical issues are likewiseending upmoderately regular in the United Kingdom, and keeping in mind that that maywithout a doubtproduce innumerable public utility after some time, the thought is still reallyfrightening. Tothe people who are involved in the works.

Inconclusion, these two films are about an era of up risings where people rise uptotake what theyneed in order to survive or to help them from oppressive leaderships. It is acommunication ofwhat is to be expected if people keep on living dangerously while ignoringenvironmentalfactors like climate change. Workcited. “FilmOf The Week: Snowpiercer – Film Comment.” Film Comment, 2017,https://www.filmcomment.com/blog/film-of-the-week-snowpiercer-bong-joon-ho/.

“FritzLang And Metropolis.” Dusty Wright’s Culture Catch, 2017,http://culturecatch.com/film/fritz-lang-metropolis.MENARD,YURIELLE. “Influential civil rights leader inspires students.”Reimer,Robert C., and Reinhard Zachau. German culture through film: anintroductionto German cinema.

Hackett Publishing, 2017.Suárez,Alex. “Extrasectionality of Atypicals: a nascent post-paninterior.”Interiors (2017): 1-11.Weiss,Aaron.

“Snowpiecerer Movie Review – Cinemafunk.” Cinemafunk, 2017,http://www.cinemafunk.com/moviereviews/snowpiercer/http://www.cinemafunk.com/movie-reviews/snowpiercer/.