Flow Theory of MotivationFlow is the mental state in which individuals are very motivated and focused. The main concept of this theory is that when learning in a state of flow people are very concentrated and forget about everything else like their surroundings, sense of time etc. (Csikszentmihalyi 1990). Being in this state person forgets about hunger, fatigue or discomfort in order to progress with the task without any interruptions (Nakamura & Csikszentmihalyi, 2002). There are two requirements to reach state of flow. Firstly the person has to be skillful for the task and secondly the task itself has to be challenging. Otherwise, if the task is too challenging and the person is not skillful enough it would lead to anxiety or if the one have the skills needed but the task is not challenging it would lead to boredom (Nakamura & Csikszentmihalyi, 2002). It is still not completely clear how to motivate students to reach state of flow in online learning environments, nevertheless there are some empirical studies already which shows significant findings about connection between flow and learning. (Choi, Kim, & Kim, 2007) conducted a study within web-based virtual learning system and found that flow provides positive learning outcomes. It also discovered correlation between flow experience, learning outcomes and attitudes towards e-learning. Learning outcomes were not only very positive, but mental state of flow was mainly created using right design solutions in the virtual learning system.The results of this research are supported by analysis of flow in an online learning environment (Pearce, Ainley, & Howard, 2005). This analysis found that flow state was reached most of the time by students which usually achieve high results. Liu, Liao, & Pratt (2009) conducted a similarly placed study which demonstrated that the motivation and intent to use e-learning technology for learning purposes was positively correlated with existence of flow. Finally, learning outcomes was found to be positively influenced when flow, electronic environments and playfulness are related (Webster, Trevino, & Ryan, 1993). ReferencesBandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prenctice Hall.Choi, D., Kim, J. and Kim, S. (2007). ERP training with a web-based electronic learning system: The flow theory perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(3), pp.223-243.Condry, J. (1977). Enemies of exploration: Self-initiated versus other-initiated learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(7), pp.459-477.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience.. New york: Harper Perennial.Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), p.319.Deci, E. and Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior .. New York: New York: Plenum.Deci, E., Koestner, R. and Ryan, R. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), pp.627-668.Guay, F., Chanal, J., Ratelle, C., Marsh, H., Larose, S. and Boivin, M. (2010). Intrinsic, identified, and controlled types of motivation for school subjects in young elementary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), pp.711-735.Keller, J. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development, 2(4), pp.26-34.Keller, J. and Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and E-learning design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3), pp.229-239.Lee, M., Cheung, C. and Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42(8), pp.1095-1104.Liu, S., Liao, H. and Pratt, J. (2009). Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers & Education, 52(3), pp.599-607.Payne, S., Youngcourt, S. and Beaubien, J. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), pp.128-150.PEARCE, J., AINLEY, M. and HOWARD, S. (2005). The ebb and flow of online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(5), pp.745-771.Ryan, R. and Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), pp.54-67.Wu, J., Tennyson, R. and Hsia, T. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), pp.155-164.Owston, R., Wideman, H., Murphy, J. and Lupshenyuk, D. (2008). Blended teacher professional development: A synthesis of three program evaluations. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), pp.201-210.F. Davis, R.P. Bagozzi, P.R. Warshaw, Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace, Journal of Applied Social Psychology (22) 1992, pp. 1111–1132Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The Concept of Flow. In C. Snyder, & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 89-105). New York: University Press. Webster, J., Trevino, L. K., & Ryan, L. (1993). The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9(4), 411-426. Kolb, D. A.: Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984. Weiner, B. (Ed.). (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89-105). New York: Oxford University Press.organization and management a system and contingency approach kastSong, L., Singleton, E., Hill, J. and Koh, M. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), pp.59-70.Paechter, M., Maier, B. and Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54(1), pp.222-229. Locke, E. (1996). Motivation through conscious goal setting. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 5(2), pp.117-124.Chrons, O. and Sundell, S. (Microtask) (2011) Digitalkoot: Making Old Archives Accessible Using Crowdsourcing, workshop at HCOMP 2011, August 8, San Francisco, CaliforniaMuntean, Cristina Ioana. “Raising engagement in e-learning through gamification.” Proc. 6th International Conference on Virtual Learning ICVL. No. 42. 2011.Kapp, Karl M. The gamification of learning and instruction : game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer, 2012. Print.