Ethical realise the purpose of participation in research

Ethical principles include
beneficence in which to do good, non-maleficence which is not to do
destruction, respect for autonomy, equality, honesty, and righteousness (Scotland, 2012). According to (Laerd Dissertation, 2012), there are numbers
of crucial ethical principles that need consideration. As a researcher, there
are five major principles need to be aware of. There are minimalizing the risk
of destruction, obtaining informed consent, protecting anonymity and
confidentiality, avoiding unreliable practices, and providing the right to

In order to minimalizing the
risk of destruction, a researcher should obtain informed consent from
participants, keeping the namelessness and secrecy of participants,
avoiding unreliable practices when planning research, providing
participants with the right to pull out from research at any time.
Critique research should not mischief participants. There must be strong
rationalizations for any possibility that participants could be maltreated or
put in a position of awkwardness. Types of maltreats that a participants are
exposed such as a physical injury, psychological misery, social hindrance,
incursion of participant’s confidentiality and anonymity (Laerd Dissertation, 2012).

Furthermore, second ethical
principle for the researcher to be obeyed is attaining informed permission. Informed
permission means the participants should realise the purpose of participation
in research and necessities of participants to the research. In other
words, the participants should be explained regarding the objective of the
research, the methodologies used, the probable outcomes of the research, as
well as associated strains, discomforts, troubles, and possibilities that the
participants may exposed to. The researchers should target not to exclude
any factual evidence that will influence the consent will (or will not) be
established. Additionally, principle of informed permission is the participants
should be participating without having been influenced and deceived.
The explanations should be provided in the case of informed permission cannot
be gained from participants (Laerd Dissertation, 2012).

Thirdly, the researchers
should protect the participants’ anonymity (namelessness) and confidentiality.
This is actually the most crucial part that will attract the participants to
deliver their information voluntarily, especially that information which is
highly privacy or sensitive in nature. Once the data has been collected, and  not treated privately, whether in terms of
storage of data, analysis, or during the publication process, there might be
more harm and dangerous. However, all data collected from research participants
does not mean needs to be kept confidential or anonymous. It may be potential
to reveal the identity and views of individuals at various stages of the
research process (from data collection through to publication of the thesis). However,
permissions are required before such confidential information is revealed. Alternatively,
the researchers are allowed to remove identifiers, like their dialect terms,
names, or geographical indications. Besides that, the researchers also can
provide substitutions when writing up the thesis. However, such a shedding
of identifiable data may not always be possible
to anticipate at the outset of your thesis when thinking about issues
of research ethics. This is not only a consideration for studies following
a qualitative research design, but also a quantitative research
design. Furthermore, the researchers have to search for permission for accessing
to data and analysis which to be constrained to the published material,
possibly only permitting it to be seen by certain individuals only. If the work
is later issued, alterations would then need to be prepared to protect the
privacy of participants (Laerd Dissertation, 2012).

Fourthly, the researchers have
to avoid unreliable practices. Critique research should avoid any
kinds of unreliable practices. Dishonesty is sometimes being an essential
component of concealed research. Concealed research reflects research
where the identity of the spectator and/or the objective
of the research are not known to participants. The researchers may choose
to take part in concealed research because it is not practicable to
let everyone know the purpose of that research. Moreover, the unconcealed
observation or surveillance of the research may change the particular
phenomenon or data that is being studied (Laerd Dissertation, 2012).

Finally, the fifth ethical
principles that used to guide the researchers are providing the participants the
right to withdraw. In relation to the fourth principle, the participants will
always have the right to withdraw at any stage from the research
progression. This principle has to go under consolation. The participant should
not be tensed or forced in any way for trying to
discontinue them from withdrawing (Laerd Dissertation, 2012).